| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2011] All ER (D) 128 (Jun) |
| Court: | Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (London) |
| Judge: | Silber J (judgment delivered extempore) |
| Representation | The appellant appeared in person. |
| Ally Wilkes (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the judicial authority. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 17 June 2011 |
Catchwords
EXTRADITION - EXTRADITION HEARING - EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT - JUDGE ORDERING APPELLANT'S EXTRADITION - APPELLANT SEEKING TO ADDUCE NEW EVIDENCE - WHETHER APPELLANT ABLE TO RELY ON NEW EVIDENCE - SS 21, 25 - EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, ART 3 .
The Case
EXTRADITION EXTRADITION HEARING. The Administrative Court, in dismissing the appellant's appeal against his extradition, held that the appellant was not permitted to adduce the additional evidence on which he sought to rely and without which he had not had any evidence to support his contentions.
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
