||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 221 (Jul)
|| EWHC 1600 (QB)
||Queen's Bench Division
||Matthew Hardwick (instructed by Kingsley Napley) for the claimant.
|| Richard Hill (instructed by Davenport Lyons) for the first, second and third defendants.
||The fourth defendant appeared in person.
||24 June 2011
Contract - Quantum meruit - Work done in anticipation of contract - Claimant providing consultancy services to third and fourth defendants in relation to development of leisure and retail theme park business - Claimant's involvement with business terminated - Claimant seeking compensation by way of quantum meruit claim for professional services rendered - Master dismissing third defendant's application for order striking out claim - Whether master erring.
Contract Quantum meruit. The Queen's Bench Division held, in dismissing the defendants' appeal against the master's decision to dismiss his application for an order striking out the claimant's claim against him for just compensation by way of a quantum meruit claim for professional services rendered, that there had been no basis upon which it could be said that the master had erred.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases