| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2011] All ER (D) 256 (Jul) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2011] EWCA Civ 839 |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Civil Division |
| Judge: | Rix, Lloyd and Stanley Burnton LJJ |
| Representation | Paul Chaisty QC and Andrew Grantham (instructed by Pannone LLP) for the claimant. |
| Peter de Verneuil Smith (instructed by Clyde & Co) for the defendant. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 26 July 2011 |
Catchwords
Contract - Breach - Repudiation - Contract for delivery of white goods - Defendant requiring additional sums to be paid - Claimant refusing - Claimant bringing action in relation to repudiatory breach of contract - Dispute over terms - Judge finding claimant in breach of contract - Whether judge erring.
The Case
Contract Breach. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, held, inter alia, that the judge erred in not finding that the claimant company had been entitled to treat its contract with the defendant as repudiated by the defendant's conduct.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
