| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2011] All ER (D) 162 (Feb) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2011] EWHC 48 (QB) |
| Court: | Queen's Bench Division |
| Judge: | Eady J |
| Representation | Harvey Starte (instructed by Pritchard Englefield) for the claimants. |
| The defendant appeared in person. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 11 February 2011 |
Catchwords
Practice - Summary judgment - Setting aside judgment - Judge entering summary judgment for claimants in their libel action - Defendants appeal against decision dismissed by Court of Appeal - Defendant applying to set aside summary judgment - Whether summary judgment should be set aside.
The Case
Practice Summary judgment. The Queen's Bench Division dismissed the defendant's application to set aside summary judgment on the basis that the judge had been misled in certain respects and that otherwise the judge would not have granted summary judgment.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
