Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2011] All ER (D) 236 (Feb)
Neutral Citation: [2011] EWHC 553 (Admin)
Court: Queen's Bench Division, Divisional Court
Judge:

Pill LJ and Supperstone J (judgment delivered extempore)
Representation Alun Jones QC and Rebecca Hill (instructed by Kaim Todner Solicitors Limited) for the appellant.
  John Hardy QC and Myles Grandison (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the judicial authority.
Judgment Dates: 22 February 2011

Catchwords

Extradition - Extradition hearing - European arrest warrant - Appellant being ordered to undergo preventative treatment in Czech Republic - Appellant's consent being required before chemical castration taking place - Appellant being arrested in United Kingdom pursuant to European arrest warrant - Judge ordering appellant's extradition - Whether extradition breaching appellant's rights - European Convention on Human Rights, arts 3, 5, 8.

The Case

Extradition Extradition hearing. The Divisional Court, in dismissing the appellant's appeal against extradition, held that there would be no breach of his rights under art3, 5 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights where the appellant might be subjected, with his consent, to chemical castration on his return.

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.

Lexis®Library

  • An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
  • Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
  • The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
  • Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases