||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 68 (Dec)
||Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (London)
Holman J (judgment delivered extempore)
||James Dennison (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown Prosecution Service.
||Mark Warwick (instructed by Hughmans Solicitors) for W.
||H appeared in person.
||7 December 2011
Proceeds of crime - Criminal property - Benefit from criminal conduct - Husband and wife living in property held in husband's sole name - Husband being convicted of conspiracy to traffic drugs - Property being subject to criminal confiscation order - Whether wife having beneficial interest in property.
Proceeds of crime Criminal property. The Administrative Court considered whether the wife had a beneficial interest in a property which was held in the sole name of her husband and which was subject to a confiscation order. The court held that, in the circumstances, the wife had a beneficial interest in one-half of the property.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases