| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2011] All ER (D) 170 (Dec) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2011] EWCA Crim 2936 |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Criminal Division |
| Judge: | Pill LJ, Foskett J and Judge Wide QC |
| Representation | David Friesner (instructed by David Phillips & Partners) for the defendant. |
| Andrew Jebb (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 21 December 2011 |
Catchwords
Sentence - Confiscation order - Proceeds of crime - Power to make order - Prosecution not serving notice at first confiscation proceedings in compliance with statute - Confiscation order made based on agreement - Judge in second confiscation proceedings making assessment as to criminal lifestyle extending beyond period preceding first confiscation order - Defendant appealing to Court of Appeal - Whether judge erring - Whether judge bound by order in first confiscation proceedings - Effect of relevant statutory provision - Residual discretion to depart from previous confiscation decision - , - .
The Case
Sentence Confiscation order. The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, in allowing the defendant's appeal against a confiscation order imposed in respect of offences of running a brothel, held that an assessment of benefit from criminal conduct in previous confiscation proceedings, albeit that the sum had been an agreed figure, had to be taken for the purposes of of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 to be the defendant's benefit from general criminal conduct and a court could not go behind that agreement at a subsequent assessment of benefit, despite the prosecution's failure in the previous confiscation hearing to serve the relevant statutory notice for the assessment of extended benefit.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases

