||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 185 (Jan)
|| EWHC 3464 (TCC)
||Queen's Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court
||Camille Slow (instructed by Ellis Taylor Law LLP) for the claimant.
||Jonathan Selby (instructed by Weightmans LLP) for the defendant.
||22 December 2011
Costs - Security for costs - Company - Claimant company bringing proceedings against defendant company claiming sums due pursuant to building contract - Defendant disputing sums due and contending overpayment made - Defendant issuing application for security for costs - Parties reaching agreement - Claimant providing security - Defendant subsequently issuing further application for security for costs - Whether further security requirement to be ordered.
Costs Security for costs. Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court): In allowing an application for further security for costs, the court had not been satisfied, inter alia, that there would be a stifling of the claim by that further security requirement and the claimant was accordingly ordered to pay into court an additional sum of 36,000.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases