||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 84 (Aug)
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Thomas LJ, Davis and Treachy JJ (judgment delivered extempore)
||Stuart Muldoon, solicitor advocate of Stevens Solicitors (Stoke-on-Trent), for the defendant.
||Kate Wilkinson (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Attorney General.
||17 August 2011
Sentence - Imprisonment - Length of sentence - Possessing Class A drug with intent to supply - Defendant being sentenced to 40 weeks' imprisonment - Attorney General referring sentence to Court of Appeal as being unduly lenient - Whether sentence unduly lenient.
Sentence Imprisonment. The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, quashed a sentence of 40 weeks' imprisonment for possession of a Class A drug with intent to supply and imposed one of four years' imprisonment on the basis that the original sentence had been unduly lenient.
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases