Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2010] All ER (D) 244 (Nov)
Neutral Citation: [2010] EWHC 2666 (Admin)
Court: Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (London)
Judge:

Lord Carlile of Berriew QC sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court
Representation Zane Malik (instructed by Malik Law Chambers Solicitors) for the claimant.
  Matthew Barnes (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State.
Judgment Dates: 25 October 2010

Catchwords

Immigration - Rules - Occupation - Claimant seeking leave to remain - Claimant's occupation not qualifying as sufficient to entitle him to requisite points - Whether unlawful for Secretary of State to enforce a requirement that applicants for leave to remain for work purposes had certain skill levels, without every job and skill being listed in detail in Immigration Rules.

The Case

Immigration Rules. The Administrative Court dismissed the claimant's application for judicial review in respect of the Secretary of State's decision to refuse him leave to remain in the United Kingdom. It was not unlawful for the Secretary of State to enforce a requirement that applicants for leave to remain for work purposes had certain skill levels, without every job and skill being listed in detail in the Immigration Rules themselves.

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.

Lexis®Library

  • An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
  • Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
  • The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
  • Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases