| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2010] All ER (D) 90 (Nov) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2010] EWCA Crim 2919 |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Criminal Division |
| Judge: | Elias J, Dobbs J and Judge Morris QC (judgment delivered extempore) |
| Representation | David Maunder (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the offender. |
| Judgment Dates: | 9 November 2010 |
Catchwords
Sentence - Custodial sentence - Dangerous offenders - Causing grievous bodily harm - Offender pouring hot water and sugar over fellow inmate - Judge imposing detention for public protection - Whether criteria of dangerousness satisfied - Whether sentence wrong in principle.
The Case
Sentence Custodial sentence. The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, held that, where a young defendant, an inmate at a young offender institution, had thrown hot water with sugar over another inmate, a sentence of detention for public protection was neither manifestly excessive nor wrong in principle and the judge had been entitled to conclude that an extended sentence was not appropriate to protect the public from the serious harm posed by the offender.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases

