Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2010] All ER (D) 65 (May)
Neutral Citation: [2010] EWHC 723 (Admin)
Court: Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (Manchester)
Judge:

Langstaff J

Representation Hugh Southey QC (instructed by Murria Solicitors, Birmingham) for the claimant.
  The defendant was not represented.
  Nicholas Chapman (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service, Revenue and Customs Division) for the interested party.
Judgment Dates: 7 May 2010

Catchwords

Crown Court - Bail - Applications - Review of refusal of bail - Claimant alleging procedural error involved in decision made by judge in Crown Court refusing him bail - Bail application having arisen in consequence of revocation of bail following finding of jury tampering at claimant's criminal trial - Claimant seeking review of bail decision in High Court - Whether Crown Court's decision procedurally flawed.

The Case

Crown Court Bail. The Administrative Court held, allowing the instant judicial review, that the judge in the Northampton Crown Court had wrongly refused the claimant bail after the claimant's bail was revoked when it came to light that there had been jury tampering at his criminal trial. The judge's decision was criticised on the basis that it involved a procedural error; the Court finding that a special advocate should have been appointed for the purposes of the bail decision.

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.