||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 221 (May)
|| EWHC 1166 (Ch)
||Stephen Smith QC and Clive Jones (instructed by Peter G Large) for the claimant.
||Jonathan Seitler QC (instructed by Hammonds) for the defendant.
||25 May 2010
Contract - Construction - Contractual term - Commercial sense - Claimant local authority contracting that defendant pilot wireless internet technology scheme prior to long term contract - Judge finding that defendant had not satisfied pilot scheme according to contract - Judge ordering defendant to remove equipment from claimant's premises - Whether judge erring in construction of contract.
Contract Construction. The Chancery Division held that the judge had been correct in his interpretation of a contract between the claimant local authority and the defendant provider of wireless internet technology.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports