Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2010] All ER (D) 221 (May)
Neutral Citation: [2010] EWHC 1166 (Ch)
Court: Chancery Division
Judge:

Roth J

Representation Stephen Smith QC and Clive Jones (instructed by Peter G Large) for the claimant.
  Jonathan Seitler QC (instructed by Hammonds) for the defendant.
Judgment Dates: 25 May 2010

Catchwords

Contract - Construction - Contractual term - Commercial sense - Claimant local authority contracting that defendant pilot wireless internet technology scheme prior to long term contract - Judge finding that defendant had not satisfied pilot scheme according to contract - Judge ordering defendant to remove equipment from claimant's premises - Whether judge erring in construction of contract.

The Case

Contract Construction. The Chancery Division held that the judge had been correct in his interpretation of a contract between the claimant local authority and the defendant provider of wireless internet technology.

Practice Areas

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.