Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2010] All ER (D) 213 (May)
Neutral Citation: [2010] EWHC 1125 (Admin)
Court: Queen's Bench Division, Divisional Court
Judge: Thomas LJ and Griffith Williams J
Representation Alun Jones QC and Rupert Bowers (instructed by Clarke & Hartland, Cardiff) for the appellant.
  Timothy Otty QC and Melanie Cumberland (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the respondent.
Judgment Dates: 19 May 2010

Catchwords

Extradition - Extradition hearing - Appeal - Respondent seeking extradition of appellant - Appellant contending extradition request not sufficiently particularised - Appellant's appeal failing - Appellant appealing to High Court - Whether offences sufficiently particularised in extradition request - Extradition Act, s 78(4)(c).

The Case

Extradition Extradition hearing. The Divisional Court held that the respondent's extradition request did not satisfy the requirements of s78(2)(c) of the as it did not sufficiently specify the particulars of the offence alleged to have been committed by the appellant. The appellant's appeal against his extradition was allowed.

View Digest What is the Digest

The judgment for this case is forthcoming.

What is the full transcript

Lexis®Library

  • An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
  • Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
  • Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
  • The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports