||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 213 (May)
|| EWHC 1125 (Admin)
||Queen's Bench Division, Divisional Court
Thomas LJ and Griffith Williams J
||Alun Jones QC and Rupert Bowers (instructed by Clarke & Hartland, Cardiff) for the appellant.
||Timothy Otty QC and Melanie Cumberland (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the respondent.
||19 May 2010
Extradition - Extradition hearing - Appeal - Respondent seeking extradition of appellant - Appellant contending extradition request not sufficiently particularised - Appellant's appeal failing - Appellant appealing to High Court - Whether offences sufficiently particularised in extradition request - Extradition Act, s 78(4)(c).
Extradition Extradition hearing. The Divisional Court held that the respondent's extradition request did not satisfy the requirements of s78(2)(c) of the as it did not sufficiently specify the particulars of the offence alleged to have been committed by the appellant. The appellant's appeal against his extradition was allowed.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports