||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 194 (Jun)
|| EWHC 1409 (TCC)
||Queen's Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court
||Andrew Kearney (instructed by Osborne Clark) for the claimant.
||Abdul Jinadu (instructed directly) for the defendant.
||17 June 2010
Construction contract - Arbitration - Adjudication - Contract rates agreed orally and left out of contract - Fax sent to parties referring to rates - Whether contract in writing - .
Construction contract Arbitration. Queen's Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court: the fact that an agreement between a building contractor and a subcontractor about rates had not been in, or evidenced in, writing, meant that it was not a construction contract in writing under the Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act 1996.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary