| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2010] All ER (D) 93 (Jun) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2010] EWCA Crim 1929 |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Criminal Division |
| Judge: | Goldring LJ, Wilkie J and Judge Loraine-Smith (judgment delivered extempore) |
| Representation | Alison Ginn (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant. |
| Gregory Perrins (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 15 June 2010 |
Catchwords
Criminal Law - Trial - Summing up - Directions to the jury - Defendant having sexually explicit images of victim on mobile phone - Defendant charged with assault by penetration - Judge directing jury on consent - Defendant convicted and sentenced to two years' imprisonment - Whether judge erring - .
The Case
Criminal Law Trial. The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, allowed the defendant's appeal against conviction for assault by penetration on the basis that the judge had erred in his summing up and in directing the jury on consent.
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
