Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2010] All ER (D) 61 (Sep)
Neutral Citation: [2010] EWCA Crim 1623
Court: Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Judge:

Lord Judge CJ, Hughes LJ and Bean J

Representation M Swift QC and P Stage (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant in the first appeal.
  A Edis QC (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown in the first appeal.
  J Israel (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant in the second appeal.
  A Edis QC and G Heimler (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown in the second appeal.
  A Metzer (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant in the third appeal..
  Rees QC (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown in the third appeal.
  R Germain (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant in the fourth appeal.
  A Edis and K Lumsdon (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown in the fourth appeal.
  T Moran (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant in the fifth appeal.
  J Smith (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown in the fifth appeal.
  M Swift QC and M Aslam (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant in the sixth appeal.
  A Edis QC (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown in the sixth appeal.
Judgment Dates: 14 July 2010

Catchwords

Criminal law - Trial - Jury - Irregularities - Collective responsibility - Written material - Use of internet - Directions to jury - Guidance.

The Case

Criminal law Trial. In the course of six separate appeals heard together in the light of common issues, the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, gave guidance as to jury irregularities and judges' guidance to jurors.

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.