||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 214 (Jul)
|| EWCA Crim 2113
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Laws LJ, Christopher Clarke J and the Recorder of Manchester (judgment delivered extempore)
||Alexander Wright (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant.
||Bernard Phelvin (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Attorney General.
||21 July 2010
Criminal evidence - Witnesses - Anonymity - Burglary - Wheel-chair bound grandmother being victim of burglary - Granddaughter purportedly identifying defendant in video identification procedure - Judge granting permission for special measures based on granddaughter's fear of being identified - Granddaughter giving evidence from behind screen - Defendant convicted - Whether conviction unsafe - .
Criminal evidence Witnesses. The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, allowed the defendant's appeal against conviction for burglary where the identifying witness in the case had been allowed to give evidence anonymously, from behind a screen. The defendant had been significantly prejudiced by not having been able to see a clear image of his principal accuser such that the court could not be satisfied that the conviction was safe.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases