| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2010] All ER (D) 161 (Dec) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2010] EWHC 3244 (Comm) |
| Court: | Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court |
| Judge: | Gloster J |
| Representation | Sara Cockerill (instructed by Elborne Mitchell) for the claimant. |
| Guy Blackwood (instructed by Waltons & Morse LLP) for the defendants. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 14 December 2010 |
Catchwords
Insurance - Contract of insurance - Exclusion clause - All risks policy - Defendant insurers insuring claimant company's cargo - Contract of insurance incorporating exclusion for 'mysterious dissapearance' - Cargo disappearing from warehouse - Claimant issuing claim under policy - Claimant applying for summary judgment - Whether claim falling within exclusion - Whether summary judgment should be granted.
The Case
Insurance Contract of insurance. The Commercial Court, Queen's Bench Division, allowed the claimant company's application for summary judgment on its claim under an insurance policy, where the defendant insurers had no real prospect of showing that the loss fell within an exemption for mysterious and unexplained loss of cargo.
Practice Areas
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases

