Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2009] All ER (D) 197 (Oct)
Court: Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (London)
Judge:

Judge McKenna sitting as a judge of the High Court (Judgment delivered extempore)

Representation Shivani Jegarajah (instructed by K Ravi Solicitors) for the claimant.
  Matthew Barnes (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State.
Judgment Dates: 20 October 2009

Catchwords

Immigration - Asylum seeker - Fresh claim - Claimant from Sri Lanka providing further representations in attempt to establish fresh asylum claim - Secretary of State deciding to reject representations - Judicial review of Secretary of State's decision regarding claimant's immigration status - Claimant producing witness statement in attempt to demonstrate close relationship with mother in United Kingdom - Whether statement may be relied upon to establish right to remain - Whether Secretary of State's decision ought to be displaced - European Convention on Human Rights, art 8.

The Case

Immigration Asylum seeker. The Administrative Court quashed the Secretary of State's decision that the claimant, a citizen of Sri Lanka, had no fresh asylum claim in the United Kingdom, having regard to a witness statement, although submitted late in the day and of which was not supported by a statement of truth, indicated that there was a more than fanciful prospect of a successful claim to remain under art8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.