Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2010] All ER (D) 75 (Jan)
Neutral Citation: [2009] EWHC 1124 (Admin)
Court: Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (London)
Judge:

Mitting J

Representation Phillippa Kaufmann (instructed by Prisoners' Advice Service) for the claimant.
  Tim Buley (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State.
Judgment Dates: 1 May 2009

Catchwords

Prison - Prisoner - Management and treatment of prisoners - Transfer to close supervision centre (CSC) - Claimant prisoner involved in serious incident within prison estate - Committee deciding claimant not suitable for transfer to CSC notwithstanding seriousness of incident - Director of High Security not ratifying decision until results of internal prison investigation made known - Committee reversing initial decision following production of internal investigation report - Whether Director having power to overturn committee decision - Whether latter decision of committee irrational.

The Case

Prison Prisoner. The Administrative Court held, in dismissing the instant judicial review, that an initial decision made by a committee concerned with 'close supervision centres' (CSCs) was not unimpeachable, that the Director of High Security had power to overturn that decision, and that the decision of the committee at a later date to recommend the claimant's transfer to a CSC unit was not irrational.

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.