||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 28 (May)
|| EWHC 886 (Admin)
||Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court
||Michael Phillips (instructed by Criminal Law Advocates) for the appellants.
||Rooma Horeesorun (instructed by the Environment Agency) for the respondent.
||31 March 2009
Costs - Order for costs - Discretion - Justices ordering appellants to pay £4000 each in costs to prosecutor representing respondent - Whether justices' costs decision irrational - Whether justices erring - Whether amounts unreasonable.
Costs Order for costs. Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court: The court dismissed an appeal by the appellants against the decision by justices to impose costs against them. The court stated that the fact there was no right of appeal to the Crown Court in relation to an order for costs was something which ought to be reconsidered.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports