| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2009] All ER (D) 190 (Jun) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2009] EWCA Civ 585 |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Civil Division |
| Judge: | Ward LJ, Lord Collins of Mapesbury and Toulson LJ |
| Representation | David Railton QC and Sonia Tolaney (instructed by Simmons & Simmons) for the claimants. |
| Jonathan Sumption QC, Susan Prevezer QC and Andrew Henshaw (instructed by Quinn Emanuel) for the defendant. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 18 June 2009 |
Catchwords
Jurisdiction - Concurrent proceedings - Assumption of jurisdiction - Parties entering into transaction - Agreements governed by English law and New York law - Claimants defaulting on assets - Dispute arising between the parties - Claimants commencing proceedings in English courts - Defendant commencing proceedings in New York courts - Whether English courts having jurisdiction to try claim.
The Case
Jurisdiction Concurrent proceedings. Court of Appeal, Civil Division: The proper approach to the construction of clauses agreeing jurisdiction was to construe them widely and generously. In the usual case the words' arising out of' or 'in connection with' applied to claims arising from pre-inception matters such as misrepresentation. However, the essential task was to construe the jurisdiction agreement in the light of the transaction as a whole. Whether a dispute fell within one or more related agreements depended on the intention of the parties as revealed by the agreements. Whether a jurisdiction clause applied to a dispute was a question of construction. Where there were numerous jurisdiction agreements which might overlap, the parties had to be presumed to be acting commercially and not to intend that similar claims should be the subject of inconsistent jurisdiction clauses.
Practice Areas
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports

