| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2009] All ER (D) 296 (Jun) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2009] EWHC 1402 (Admin) |
| Court: | Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (London) |
| Judge: | Mitting J |
| Representation | The claimant did not appear and was not represented. |
| Samantha Broadfoot (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) appeared on behalf of the Secretary of State. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 8 June 2009 |
Catchwords
Immigration - Asylum seeker - Family amnesty - Fresh claim - Claimant from Pakistan unsuccessfully claiming asylum in United Kingdom - Claimant's wife and family arriving - Wife stating that claimant in Pakistan - Claimant applying for indefinite leave to remain on basis of family concession - Refusal by Secretary of State to treat claim as fresh claim and refusal to grant claimant and family indefinite leave - Whether claimant had returned to Pakistan after refusal of asylum claim and before arrival of family - Whether claimant living as family unit in UK - Immigration Rules, para 353.
The Case
Immigration Asylum seeker. Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (London): The decision of the Secretary of State that the claimant was not entitled to indefinite leave to remain under the family concession was unimpeachable.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
