| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2009] All ER (D) 293 (Jun) |
| Court: | Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (London) |
| Judge: | Mitting J (Judgment delivered extempore) |
| Representation | Amanda Jones (instructed by Bhogal Partners, Hounslow) for the claimant. |
| John-Paul Waite (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 26 June 2009 |
Catchwords
Extradition - Extradition hearing - Jurisdiction - Abuse of process - Claimant entering United Kingdom - Claimant's husband making application for asylum on behalf of family refused - Claimant's husband and family ordered to be removed from UK - Claimant and family absconding and failing to meet conditions - Orders for removal continually ignored - Claimant refused grant of leave under seven year concession - Claimant applying for judicial review of that decision - Whether Secretary of State in error.
The Case
Extradition Extradition hearing. Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (London): The court ruled that the claimant, in the instant case, had done nothing more than repeat an application for judicial review that she had previously abandoned in relation to extradition of herself and her children back to Mongolia.
Lexis®Library
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
