||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 129 (Jul)
|| EWHC 1671 (Pat)
||Chancery Division, Patents Court
||John Baldwin QC and Adrian Speck (instructed by McDermott Will & Emery UK LLP) for the claimants.
||Simon Thorley QC and Justin Turner QC (instructed by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP) for the defendants.
||10 July 2009
Patent - Infringement - Validity of Patent - Novelty - Obviousness - Whether patent for extended wear contact lenses anticipated by prior art - Whether patent specifications insufficient - Whether patent infringed if valid - - Article 83 European Patents Convention
Patent Infringement. Chancery Division; Patents Court: in dismissing a claim for infringement of a patent for the design of contact lenses it was held that the patent was invalid for insufficiency.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports