| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2009] All ER (D) 50 (Jul) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2009] EWHC 1611 (Admin) |
| Court: | Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (London) |
| Judge: | Keith J |
| Representation | James Eadie QC and Gerry Facenna (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the appellants. |
| Anya Proops (instructed by the Office of the Information Commissioner) for the respondent. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 6 July 2009 |
Catchwords
Freedom of information - Exempt information - Disclosure prohibited by or under enactment - Request for information about how previous requests for information handled (meta-request) - Home Office refusing meta-request relying on particular statutory exemptions justifying non-disclosure - Defendant commissioner finding balance weighing in favour of disclosure - Information Tribunal agreeing with commissioner - Test to be applied when considering whether to accept meta-requests - Whether Home Office able to rely on certain statutory exemptions in having meta-request rejected - ss 1, 2, 36.
The Case
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports

