||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 169 (Aug)
|| EWHC 290 (Admin)
||Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court
||David Yates (instructed by Huntingwood Trading Ltd) for the claimant.
||Samia Hanif (instructed by the Revenue and Customs Commissioners) for the Revenue.
||21 January 2009
Customs and excise - Duties - Excise duty - Reimbursement of duty via 'WFE drawback' - Approach of revenue to verification of claims for reimbursement of duty - Claimant successfully claiming reimbursement - Revenue subsequently refusing to repay duty - Whether Revenue engendering in claimant legitimate expectation that claims would proceed in particular way - Whether claimant entitled to reimbursement - Excise Goods (Drawback) Regulations 1995, SI 1995/1046, regs 5, 7, 12.
Customs and excise Duties. Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court: A claim for judicial review of the Revenue's decision not to repay duty which the claimant claimed had already been paid on goods warehoused for export failed, where, on the facts, the Revenue had not engendered in the claimant a legitimate expectation as to the procedure which it would follow when verifying such claims.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases