||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 181 (Jan)
|| EWHC 87 (QB)
||Queen's Bench Division, Divisional Court
Scott Baker LJ and Maddison J
||Philip Rule and Castle Chambers (instructed by Elin & Co) for the appellant.
||Ethu Crorie (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the prosecution.
||23 January 2009
Road traffic - Motor vehicle - Special type - Appellant's vehicle fitted with, inter alia, red and blue strobe lights to front and rear and with siren - Justices convicting appellant of road traffic offence - Appellant alleging justices applying incorrect test in determining whether his vehicle was a vehicle used for ambulance purposes - Whether justices erring - Road Vehicles (Construction and Use Regulations) 1986 .
Road traffic Motor vehicle. Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court: The court ruled that the test to be applied, in determining whether a vehicle was a vehicle 'used for ambulance purposes', was whether the vehicle was used, or primarily used, for conveying the sick, the injured or disabled.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports