| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2009] All ER (D) 85 (Dec) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2009] EWHC 3221 (Admin) |
| Court: | Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (London) |
| Judge: | Cranston J |
| Representation | Peter Oldham and Stephen Robins (instructed by Unison Legal Services) for the claimant. |
| Michael Fordham QC and David Pievsky (instructed by Denton Wilde Sapte) for the defendant. | |
| Javan Herberg and Mark Vinall (instructed by DWP/DH Legal Services) for the first interested party. | |
| Robert Jay QC (instructed by Capsticks) for the second interested party. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 9 December 2009 |
Catchwords
National Health Service - General medical services - Foundation trust - Income derived from private charges - Defendant independent regulator of NHS trusts fixing cap on proportion of income which foundation trusts could derive from private charges - Whether approach to fixing of cap unlawful - ss 43, 44.
The Case
National Health Service General medical services. The Administrative Court held that the defendant independent regulator of National Health Service (NHS) trusts had erred in law in adopting the approach which it had to the fixing of a cap on the proportion of a foundation trust's income which could be derived from private charges. The concept of 'income derived from' meant that any income from an intermediate structure, interposed to perform private work in that way, was caught by the cap. The approach followed by the defendant did not reflect the intention of Parliament, as expressed in the legislation: there was a statutory context and legal pedigree to the concept of 'income derived from', in the instant case, which determined its meaning, but nowhere in the background material to the defendant's decision did there appear to be any real consideration of that concept.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports

