||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 63 (Dec)
|| EWHC 3142 (Comm)
||Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court
||Peter Watson of Allen & Overy LLP for the claimant.
||John Kimbell (instructed by Andrew Jackson) for the defendant.
||4 December 2009
Aircraft - Contract for lease of - Termination of agreement - Claimant and defendant entering into lease agreement for aircraft - Defendant failing to pay sums falling due - Claimant seeking to terminate lease and take possession of aircraft - Defendant seeking to pay sums due by way of set off - Claimant contending defendant not entitled to set off through being in continuing default - Claimant seeking summary judgment - Whether defendant having real prospect of defending claim.
Aircraft Contract for lease of. The Commercial Court in granting the claimant summary judgment for sums due in respect of supplemental rent due under a lease agreement for the lease of aircraft to the defendant airline, held that the defendant was in default of the lease and therefore was not entitled to a reduction in deposit.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports