| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2009] All ER (D) 52 (Sep) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2009] EWCA Civ 674 |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Civil Division |
| Judge: | Thorpe and Wall LJJ |
| Representation | The mother appeared in person. |
| The father did not appear and was not represented. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 23 April 2009 |
Catchwords
Family proceedings - Orders in family proceedings - Order restricting applications without leave of court - Mother applying to increase contact with child - Father making application to restrict mother making applications - Judge refusing to increase contact with child - Judge acceding to father's application - Whether judge erring - s 91(14).
The Case
Family proceedings Orders in family proceedings. Court of Appeal, Civil Division: Whilst the judge had been correct to conclude that supervised contact between the mother and the child should not be increased, he had erred in making an order restricting the mother from bringing an application in relation the child under s91(14) of the .
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
