| Publisher Citation: | [2008] All ER (D) 118 (Sep) |
| Court: | Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court |
| Judge: | Underhill J |
| Representation | Pearl Yong (instructed by Warren & Co) for the claimant. |
| Judgment Dates: | 30 September 2008 |
Catchwords
Immigration - Asylum seeker - Fresh claim - Claimant lodging further submissions as fresh claim - Whether Secretary of State entitled to find submissions not amounting to fresh claim - Immigration Rules, r 353.
The Case
Immigration Asylum seeker. The Secretary of State had not erred in deciding that the claimant's further submissions had not amounted to a fresh claim within the meaning of r353 of the Immigration Rules. It could not be said that the Secretary of State had failed to have regard to expert evidence submitted by the claimant.
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
