||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 179 (Oct)
|| EWHC 2418 (Admin)
||Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court
Judge Inglis sitting as a judge of the High Court
||David Wolfe (instructed by Levenes) for the appellant.
||Kathryn White (instructed by Angela Reid) for the authority.
||16 October 2008
Education - Special educational needs - Educational provision - Requirement to give reasons - Appellant's child subject to local education authority's statement of special educational needs - Authority naming maintained special day school in statement - Appellant appealing to Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal contending for special boarding school - Tribunal deciding in authority's favour - Whether decision inadequately reasoned and hence unlawful - s 11.
Education Special educational needs. Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court: In a case which had been brought pursuant to s11 of the the Administrative Court decided that the Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal's determination, in respect of an appeal concerning the choice of school for a child with Prader Willi Syndrome, was not inadequately reasoned or unlawful.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports