||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 307 (Oct)
|| EWHC 1928 (QB)
||Queen's Bench Division
||Anthony Tanney (instructed by Ellisons Solicitors) for the claimants.
||Stephen Cottle (instructed by Shelter Legal Services) for the first and second defendants.
||David Schmitz (assigned by the Bar Pro Bono Unit) for the third defendant.
||30 October 2008
Landlord and tenant - Tenancy - Tenancy distinguished from licence - First claimant submitting defendants having periodic tenancies terminable on notice in respect of lodges in question - Defendant arguing that leases should be granted in respect of lodges on basis of equitable right - Whether defendant having security of tenure.
Landlord and tenant Tenancy. Queen's Bench Division: A declaration was made that the defendants had security of tenure in respect of lodges held by the first claimant where the defendants had alleged that they had bought the lodges from the second claimant on the strength of promises that they would be granted leases for their sites until the end of the first claimant's lease.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports