Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2008] All ER (D) 223 (May)
Court: Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Judge:

David Clarke and McDuff JJ

Representation James Hanlon (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant.
  Bo-Eun Jung (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown.
Judgment Dates: 16 May 2008

Catchwords

Sentence - Imprisonment - Theft - Going equipped for theft - Breach of community order - Length of sentence - Two years' imprisonment - Whether sentence manifestly excessive.

The Case

The defendant's appeal against a sentence of two years' imprisonment imposed following pleas of guilty of, inter alia, three counts of theft, would be allowed. In the instant case, the defendant had been entitled to credit for his guilty pleas and there was nothing in the judge's sentencing remarks to indicate that he had taken them into account. The judge's failure to have regard to the early pleas, the defendant's frankness in interview, and his partial compliance with a community order previously imposed, led to a conclusion that a sentence of 18 months' imprisonment, rather than the two years' imprisonment which had been imposed, was appropriate. Accordingly, the sentence of two years' imprisonment would be quashed and substituted by a sentence of 18 months' imprisonment, to run concurrently.

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.