| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2008] All ER (D) 17 (May) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2008] EWHC 964 (Ch) |
| Court: | Chancery Division |
| Judge: | Sarah Asplin QC sitting as a deputy High Court judge |
| Representation | Keith Rowley QC (instructed by Eversheds LLP) for the claimants. |
| Paul Newman (instructed by Pinsent Masons) for the first defendant. | |
| Nicolas Stallworthy (instructed by Rowley Ashworth) for the second and third defendant. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 1 May 2008 |
Catchwords
Pension - Pension scheme - Company pension scheme - Money purchase benefits - Actuarial factors - Whether scheme money purchase scheme - s 73.
The Case
In ruling on a pension scheme for the purposes of s181 of the the court held that the application of actuarial factors was not inevitably fatal to the contention that the benefits arising from the members' interest were money purchase benefits. It should make no difference whether the trustee had secured such benefits by means of 'internal annuitisation' or purchased an annuity in the market, either in its own name or that of the member.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
