| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2008] All ER (D) 351 (Jun) |
| Court: | Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court |
| Judge: | Judge Mackie QC sitting as a deputy High Court judge |
| Representation | Richard Wilson QC and Philip Nathan (instructed by ) for the claimants. |
| Robin Tam QC and Daniel Beard (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 25 June 2008 |
Catchwords
Immigration - Asylum seeker - Fresh claim - Access to labour market when 'application for asylum' not determined within one year - Decision on whether representations constituting fresh claim not made within one year - Whether claimants entitled to access labour market - Whether submission of representations said to be fresh claim an 'application for asylum' - Immigration Rules, rr 353, 360, 360A - Council Directive (EC) 2003/9, arts 2(b), 2(c), 11(2) - Council Directive (EC) 2005/85, arts 2(b), 2(c), 32.
The Case
Immigration Asylum seeker. The submission of a fresh claim under r353 of the Immigration Rules did not amount to an application for asylum within the meaning of art11 of the Council Directive (EC)2003-9, and r360 and r360A of the the Immigration Rules, so that a person making an application for a fresh claim became entitled to access the labour market under those latter provisions if that application had not been accepted as a fresh claim after 12 months.
Lexis®Library
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
