||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 21 (Jun)
|| EWHC 1183 (Admin)
||Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court
Wyn Williams J
||Martin Westgate (instructed by Russell Jones and Walker) for the claimant.
||Jeremy Johnson (instructed by the Director of Legal Services) for the defendant.
||4 June 2008
Police - Compulsory retirement - Extension of employment - Claimant police officer applying for extension - Defendant police authority's Chief Superintendent refusing claimant's application - Whether decision amenable to judicial review - Whether decision unlawful - Police Pensions Regulations 1987, SI 1987/257, reg A 19.
There was no sensible reason why a decision that forced retirement upon a police officer should not be susceptible to judicial review to ensure that it conformed to the rules of natural justice. A necessary incidence of that finding was that the claimant had the right to be heard about any proposed decision to force him to retire before it was made. In the instant case, the complete absence of any procedure whereby the claimant could make representations about the proposed decision to make him retire before it was made and the failure to see representations from the claimant rendered the defendant's decision unlawful.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports