||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 15 (Jun)
||European Court of Human Rights
Judge Casadevall (President), Judges Fura-Sandstrom, Bratza, Birsan, Zupancic, Myjer and Ziemele, and Mr S Quesada (Section Registrar)
||3 June 2008
Human rights - Fair trial - Family life - Minor - Custody - Rights of custody - Foreign custody rights - Wrongful removal or retention - Mother removing child from Romania without knowledge or consent of divorced father - Father requesting return of child - English proceedings lasting three years and nine months - Romanian proceedings lasting two years - Whether breach of father's right to a family life - Whether breach of reasonable time requirement - Whether complaints admissible - Whether father entitled to just satisfaction for non-pecuniary loss - European Convention on Human Rights, arts 6(1), 8 and 41.
In so far as a complaint about the outcome of the Hague Convention proceedings in both the English and Romanian jurisdictions was concerned, it was necessary to ensure the observance of the engagements undertaken by the Contracting Parties to the European Convention on Human Rights as interpreted in the light of the requirements of the Hague Convention. However, it was not the European Court of Human Rights' function to deal with errors of fact or law allegedly committed by a national court unless and in so far as they might have infringed rights and freedoms protected by the Convention. That had not occurred in the case of the applicant who was seeking to obtain a ruling that his ex-wife had acted unlawfully in taking their child from Romania to London and therefore his complaint under art8 of the Convention was not admissible. However, he was awarded 1,000 in non-pecuniary damages in respect of a breach of the reasonable time requirement in art6(1) of the Convention where the Romanian courts had taken two years to determine a point under the Hague Convention. However, there had been no violation of that article by the English Courts as they could not come to a decision before the end of the Romanian proceedings.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports