||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 253 (Jun)
|| EWHC 3626 (Admin)
||Queen's Bench Division, Divisional Court
Richards LJ and Mackay J
||The appellant did not appear and was not represented.
||Mark Weekes (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the requesting judicial authority.
||19 June 2008
Extradition - Hearing - Extradition offence - European arrest warrant - Validity - Warrant failing to specify length of sentence still to be served - Whether invalidating warrant - Extradition Act 2003, s 2(6)(e).
Extradition Hearing. The court rejected the appellant's argument that one of the European arrest warrants issued for his extradition was not valid in that it failed to reflect that he had served six months in custody on remand and that the district judge should have requested further information from the Polish authorities. There was no basis for going behind what was in the European arrest warrant as the additional detail would not go to the validity of the warrant even if the appellant was right that he had served six months in custody on remand.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports