| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2008] All ER (D) 93 (Jan) |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Civil Division |
| Judge: | Sedley, Hooper and Rimer LJJ |
| Representation | David Jones (instructed by Halliday Reeves Solicitors) for the claimant. |
| Parishil Patel (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 18 January 2008 |
Catchwords
Immigration - Asylum seeker - Appeal - Claimant converting to Christian faith from Islam - Claimant's further application for leave to remain refused - Claimant appealing to Asylum and Immigration Tribunal on grounds of persecution if returned due to his conversion - Immigration judge dismissing appeal - Senior immigration judge upholding that decision - Whether senior immigration judge erring.
The Case
Where the defendant, an Afghan citizen of Muslim upbringing, converted to the Christian faith, and had been refused leave to remain in the United Kingdom and had his appeal hearings dismissed, the senior immigration judge's findings that there was no risk on return to converts was wholly untenable and perverse. Moreover, the immigration judge had given insufficient consideration to the material before him. Accordingly, the case would be remitted for reconsideration by a different judge.
Practice Areas
Lexis®Library
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports

