||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 290 (Jan)
||Michael Todd QC and Alexander Hill Smith (instructed by BrookStreet Des Roches LLP) for the appellants.
||Robin Hollington QC (instructed by BP Collins) for the respondent.
||31 January 2008
Contract - Offer and acceptance - Offer - Appellants and respondent owning shares in holding company - Respondent presenting petition alleging unfair prejudice - Respondent suggesting appellants sell shares to him - Appellants corresponding separately but through same solicitors' firm - Letter from solicitors' firm containing offer by first appellant to pay respondent's costs on basis appellants sell shares - Whether letter constituting offer solely as to costs or to sell shares - Whether offer to sell shares on behalf of first appellant or both appellants.
Where the appellants appealed against an order, inter alia, declaring that they had agreed to sell their shares in a holding company to the respondent, submitting that there had only been an offer by the first appellant to pay the respondent's costs, the appeal was dismissed. It was not possible to treat the words of a letter from the appellants' solicitor as purely an offer as to costs alone. To accept liability for costs but leave all other issues on the petition open defied commercial sense. Furthermore, an objective observer would have treated the letter as an offer also on behalf of the second appellant.
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports