Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2008] All ER (D) 232 (Dec)
Neutral Citation: [2008] EWHC 1929 (Fam)
Court: Family Division
Judge:

Sir Mark Potter P

Representation Matthew Firth for the petitioner.
  Michael Glaser for the respondent.
Judgment Dates: 19 December 2008

Catchwords

Divorce - Financial provision - Ancillary relief - Order - District judge making ancillary relief order - Whether district judge erring.

The Case

Divorce Financial provision. Family Division: In order to achieve overall fairness to the petitioning wife, and in the light of the restricted resources available, in addition to the amount payable to the petitioner under the order of the district judge, the respondent husband would be ordered to pay a lump sum of 35,000.

Practice Areas

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.