| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2007] All ER (D) 140 (Dec) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2007] EWCA Crim 2470 |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Criminal Division |
| Judge: | Laws LJ, Gibbs J and Sir Michael Wright |
| Representation | Jacinta Jones (assigned by the Registrar of Criminals Appeals) |
| Judgment Dates: | 25 September 2007 |
Catchwords
Sentence - Imprisonment - Length of sentence - Supply of cocaine - Conspiracy to supply crack cocaine - Defendant entering written basis of plea stating offence part of course of conduct - Judge imposing consecutive sentences - Whether judge erring - Whether sentence manifestly excessive.
The Case
The defendant's appeal against his concurrent sentences of two years' imprisonment in respect of the nine counts of supplying cocaine and a consecutive of four-and-a-half years in respect of one count of conspiracy to supply cocaine was allowed on the basis that the sentences were contrary to the written basis of plea and inconsistent with a Goodyear indication given earlier in the proceedings. Accordingly, the sentences of two years passed on the nine counts of supplying cocaine were ordered to run concurrently with the sentence of four-and-a-half years passed on the conspiracy count.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports

