| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2007] All ER (D) 18 (Dec) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2007] EWCA Crim 2416 |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Criminal Division |
| Judge: | Gray and Wilkie JJ |
| Representation | Janet Ironfield (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant. |
| Judgment Dates: | 27 September 2007 |
Catchwords
Sentence - Imprisonment - Length of sentence - Robbery - Defendant and co-accused being sentenced to eight years' imprisonment - Co-accused's term being reduced on appeal - Whether defendant's term should be reduced in line with that of co-accused
The Case
There being no grounds to distinguish the defendant's involvement in a robbery from that of his co-accused, his sentence would be reduced from eight years to six in line with the Court of Appeal's earlier decision on the co-accused.
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
