Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2007] All ER (D) 499 (Nov)
Court: Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court
Judge:

Sullivan J
Representation Jonathan Powell (instructed by Pollecoff Solicitors) for the claimant.
  Paul Greatorex (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the defendants.
Judgment Dates: 30 November 2007

Catchwords

Town and country planning - Permission for development - Refusal - Claimant challenging inspector's decision upholding planning authority's refusal of permission - Whether inspecter erring in assessing access to proposed dwelling as a cul-de-sac.

The Case

Town and country planningPermission for development. The developer's appeal against the inspector's decision, upholding the planning authority's refusal to allow it permission to build a dwelling house at land to the rear of a property in Surrey, was dismissed as the inspector had been entitled to come to his conclusion that the planned development would represent development in depth involving the formation of a new cul-de-sac, which could be an access road that led to dead end, contrary to policy BE7, and specifically criterion (F), of the Tandridge District local Plan 2001.

Practice Areas

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.

Lexis®Library

  • Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
  • Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
  • The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports