| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2007] All ER (D) 129 (Nov) |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Criminal Division |
| Judge: | Tuckey LJ, Foskett J and Judge Patience QC |
| Representation | Jonathan Davies (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant. |
| Andrew Marshall (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 8 November 2007 |
Catchwords
Criminal law - Trial - No case to answer - Conspiracy to cheat the public revenue - Judge allowing amendment to original indictment and rejecting no case submission - Defendants being convicted - Whether judge erring.
The Case
The defendant's appeal against conviction for conspiracy to defraud the public revenue in a case involving allegations of 'market fraud' and 'carousal fraud' would be dismissed. The judge had not erred in allowing the case to proceed on an amended indictment after he had ruled that there was no evidence on which to convict the defendant of 'carousal fraud'.
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
