A
- A local authority v K and another
- A local authority v P and others
- ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd and another v Hiscox Dedicated Corporate Member Ltd and others ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd and another v Jardine Lloyd Thompson Ltd
- Abu Dhabi Investment Co and others v H Clarkson & Co Ltd and others
- AC Yule & Son Ltd v Speedwell Roofing & Cladding Ltd
- Aduma v Mehmet (trading as Rose Hotel Group)
- AIC Ltd v Marine Pilot Ltd
- Anderson and others v Corus UK Ltd
- Anderson Antiques (UK) Ltd v Anderson Wharf (Hull) Ltd and another
- Ang v Aroma (Northampton) Ltd
- Anglo Petroleum Ltd and another v TFB (Mortgages) Ltd
- ART Consultancy Ltd v Nevada Trading Ltd
- Attorney General's Reference (No 16 of 2007) R v Hargreaves
- Attorney General's Reference (No 18 of 2007)
- Attorney General's Reference (No 19 of 2007) R v Holroyd
- Attorney General's Reference (No 20 of 2007) R v Sedgwick
- Attorney General's Reference (No 21 of 2007) R v Oakes
- Attorney General's Reference (No 23 of 2007) R v T
- Attorney General's Reference (No 44 of 2007) R v McNeice
- Attorney General's Reference (No 9 of 2007) R v Haigh
- Attorney General's References (Nos 143 and 144 of 2006) R v Brown and another
- Attorney General's References (Nos 32, 33 and 34 of 2007) R v Bates and another
- Attorney-General's Reference (No 55 of 2007)
- AWB Geneva SA and another v North America Steamships Ltd
B
- Barnetson v Framlington Group Ltd and another
- Bauerfield v Metrobus Ltd
- Beaven v Lichfield Personnel and Recruitment Ltd
- Benichou v Mauritius Commercial Bank
- Bezant v Rausing and others
- Birmingham City Council v Walker
- Biswas v General Medical Council
- Boake Allen Ltd and others v Revenue and Customs Commissioners (sub nom NEC Semi-Conductors Ltd and others v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
- Bunney v Burns Anderson plc and another Cahill v Timothy James & Partners Ltd
- Burke and another v Compass Group UK and Ireland (trading as Scolarest)
C
- C plc v P
- Calor Gas Ltd v Homebase Ltd
- Carcianiga v British Leprosy Relief Association
- Carmel Southend Ltd v Strachan & Henshaw
- Charman v Charman
- CMS Peripherals Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
- Collidge v Freeport plc
- Colman v Scott and others
- Connolly v Law Society
D
- Daniels v Barnet London Borough Council
- Datec Electronics Holdings Limited and others v United Parcels Services Limited
- Der Grune Punkt-Duales System Deutschland GmbH v European Commission (Case T-151/01)
- Der Grune Punkt-Duales System Deutschland GmbH v European Commission (Case T-289/01)
- Dolphin Quays Developments Ltd v Mills and others
- Domsalla (trading as Domsalla Building Services) v Dyason
- Drozdowski and another v Garrity and another
- Drury v British Broadcasting Corporation and another
- Drury v British Broadcasting Corporation and another
- Duffus v National Water Commission
E
- Emap Active Ltd v Hill (trading as Bob Hill Motor Cycles)
- ERG Raffinerie Mediterranee Spa v Chevron USA Inc (trading as Chevron Texaco Global Trading)
- European Commission v IIC Informations-Industrie Consulting GmbH (Case T-500/04)
- Experience Hendrix LLC v Purple Haze Records Ltd and others
F
- Farooq v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
- Finning (UK) Ltd v Inveresk plc
- Fiona Trust Holding Corp and others v Privalov and others
- Ford-Camber Ltd v Deanminster Ltd and another
- Fosberry and another v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
- Fosberry v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
- Francis v Kennedy Scott Ltd
- Franklin v GC Bateman
G
- Garth v Grant and another
- Great Hill Partners II LP v Novator One LP and others
- Gurhy v Oliver & Saunders (Developments) Ltd
H
- Halifax plc v Okin
- Hamilton v Brentwood and Ongar Conservative Association
- Harrington v Wakeling
- Her Majesty's Advocate v DS
- HF (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Hodgson v ADM Milling Ltd
- Holbock v Finanzamt Salzburg-Land (Case C-157/05)
- Hooper v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
- Housden and another v Conservators of Wimbledon and Putney Commons
- Howard de Walden Estates Ltd v Aggio and others Earl Cadogan and Cadogan Estates Ltd v 26 Cadogan Square Ltd
- Howard v Hospital of St Mary of Furness
I
J
K
- Kalatara Holdings Ltd v Anderson and another
- Kalwak and others v Consistent Group Ltd and another
- Kay v Metropolitan Police Commissioner
- Klentzeris v Klentzeris
- Knight v Beyond Properties Pty Ltd and others
- KR (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
L
- La Caisse Regional Du Credit and another v Ashdown
- Lambrou v Cyprus Airways Ltd
- Lawrence v Pembrokeshire County Council
- Lay and others v Drexler and others (trading as Littlestone Martin Glenton)
- Liverpool Freeport Electronics Ltd and others v Habib Bank Ltd
- Lord Chancellor v Haggan and others
- Lyle & Scott Ltd v Primark Stores Ltd
M
- Maatschap Schonewille-Prins v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (case C-45/05)
- Mabey and Johnson Ltd v Danos and others
- Maranowski v Richardson and another
- Marcan Shipping (London) Ltd v Kefalas and another
- Mast Electrical Services (as a trading division of John W & S Dorin Ltd) v Kendall Cross Holdings Ltd
- Mawle v West Oxfordshire District Council
- McLaren v Kubiak
- Mead and another v Babington (formerly trading as Babington Estate Agents) and another
- Mebrom NV v European Commission (Case T-198/05)
- Mebrom NV v European Commission (Case T-216/05)
- MO (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Mott MacDonald Ltd v London & Regional Properties Ltd
- Mulheim Pipe Coatings GmbH v Chemetall plc
N
O
- Ogilvy and Mather Ltd v Silverado Blue Ltd
- Ogunrinde and another v The Law Society
- Onwuka v Spherion Technology (UK) Ltd and others
P
- Petromec Inc v Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. Petrobras and another
- Prescott v Dunwoody Sports Marketing
- Procter & Gamble Company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Joined Cases T-241/05, T-262/05 to T-264/05, T-346/05, T-347/05, T-29/06 to T-31/06)
R
- R (on the application for the Secretary of State for Defence) v Pensions Appeal Tribunal
- R (on the application of A) v South Yorkshire Police and another
- R (on the application of AK (Afghanistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of Baiai and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department R (on the application of Bigoku and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department R (on the application of Tilki) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs
- R (on the application of Bullmore) v West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust
- R (on the application of Cooper) v Parole Board
- R (on the application of Jones and others v Ceredigion County Council
- R (on the application of Kilby) v Basildon District Council
- R (on the application of Legal Remedy UK Ltd) v Secretary of State for Health
- R (on the application of London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
- R (on the application of Ramblers Association) v Secretary of State for Defence
- R (on the application of S) v Sutton London Borough Council
- R (on the application of Thames Water Utilities Ltd) v Bromley Magistrates Court (Case C-252/05)
- R (on the application of the Kings Cross Railway Lands Group) v Camden London Borough Council
- R (on the application of the Secretary of State for Defence) v Pensions Appeal Tribunal
- R (on the application of Tratt) v Horsham District Council
- R (on the application of Wellington) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R v Ashtari
- R v Avery
- R v B and another
- R v Baker
- R v Barot
- R v Brown
- R v C
- R v Connolly
- R v D
- R v Davies
- R v Dawes and others
- R v Dinh
- R v Dobson
- R v Finch
- R v Fox
- R v G
- R v Gonsalves
- R v Goode
- R v Greaves
- R v Green
- R v Hallam
- R v Harris
- R v Hendy-Freegard
- R v Hester and another
- R v Hirst
- R v Howard
- R v James
- R v Jones
- R v Kinnear
- R v Lawrence
- R v Lloyd
- R v Lloyd and another
- R v McCleod
- R v McGowan
- R v Mirza
- R v Musone
- R v Nasser and another
- R v Pearson
- R v Pearson and another
- R v Pelham
- R v Rees
- R v S
- R v Sampson and others
- R v Scannell
- R v Skinner
- R v Spartley
- R v Stephens and another
- R v Sutton
- R v T
- R v Tailor
- R v Taylor and another
- R v Tirnaveanu
- R v Townsend
- R v Venn
- R v Walsh
- R v West
- R v West
- R v Whitehead
- R v Willey (appeal under s 58 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- R v Wilson
- R v Wood
- Raytheon Company v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks
- Re Alker (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re B (a child)
- Re Blastland (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Bolsover (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Burgess (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Butcher (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Button (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re C (a child) (supervision order)
- Re C (children) (psychiatric evidence)
- Re C-E (children) (care proceedings: contact)
- Re Callaghan (reference under para 3 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Carroll (application under para 3 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Cassidy and others (references under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Cogan (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Connely (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Connor (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Copland (application pursuant to para 3 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Crewe and Honan (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Cummings (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Dore (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re F (Children) (interim care order)
- Re Ferjani (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Foy (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re G (children) (care proceedings: adequacy of reasons)
- Re Gorringe (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Hawkes Hill Publishing Co Ltd (in liquidation) Ward v Perks and another
- Re Ives (application under para 3 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Kenton (application under para 3 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Kippax (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Little (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re M (a child)
- Re Machin (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Mascoll (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re McInnes (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re McNamara (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Millar (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re O'Toole (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re P (children)(care proceedings)
- Re Price (application under para 3 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Ryan (application under para 3 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Salmon (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Samuel (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Smith (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Thomas (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Thompson (application under para 3 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Tonks (application pursuant to para 3 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re W (a child) (contact: leave to apply)
- Re Watson (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Wilkinson (reference under para 6 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Re Yates (application under para 3 of Sch 22 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003)
- Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Barclays Bank plc
- Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Berriman R (on the application of Revenue and Customs Commissioners) v Teeside Crown Court
- Revenue and Customs Protection Office v T and another
- Roberts v Valley Rose Ltd (trading as Fernbank Nursing Home)
- Royal Mail Group Plc v Postal Services Commission
- Runkee and another v United Kingdom
S
- S v S
- Sage (UK) Ltd v Bacco
- Sandhu v Jan de Rijk Transport Ltd
- Scanlon v Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council
- Secretary of State for the Home Department v E and another
- Seventh Earl of Malmesbury and others v Strutt & Parker (a partnership) and another
- SGL Carbon AG v European Commission (Case C-328/05 P)
- Shanks v Swan Hunter Group plc
- Shaw v CCL Ltd
- Shepherd v New Southern Railway (trading as Southern)
- Shierson and another v Rastogi
- Signet Partners Ltd v Signet Research and Advisory SA and others
- Sillett and another v Meek
- Skeete v Pick and another
- Smallwood v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
- Smith v North Somerset District Council
- Smith v Smith
- Soper v The Royal Bank of Scotland
- SR (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Standley v Hertfordshire Window Co Ltd
- Stax Claimants v Bank of Nova Scotia Channel Islands Ltd and others
- Steward v Kingston-upon-Thames RBC
- Swissport (UK) Ltd v Aer Lingus Ltd
- Sydenhams (Timber Engineering) Ltd v CHG Holdings Ltd
T
- Taylor v Merseyrail Electrics 2002 Ltd
- The Black & Decker Corporation v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Joined Cases T-239/05, T-240/05, T-245/05 to T-247/05, T-255/05, T-274/05 to T-280/05)
- The Queen v Bain
- The State v Bernard
- Tkachuk v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
- Tomlinson v Wilson
- Trans-world Investments Ltd v Dadarwalla
- Trustees of the Edmond Stern Settlement v Levy
- Turner v Birmingham City Council
- Turner v Turner
U
- Universal Business Solutions Limited v Compass Group Plc and Others
- Uzinterimpex JSC v Standard Bank plc
V
W
- Wakeling v McDonagh and another
- Walbrook Trustees (IOM) Ltd and another v Liberty Centre (Trustee No 1) Ltd and another
- Wall v Collins and another
- Wedlake Bell (a firm) v Jones and another
- Wolverhampton City Council v Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal
- Woventex Ltd (in receivership) v Benichou and others
