| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2006] All ER (D) 327 (Oct) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2006] EWCA Civ 1319 |
| Court: | Court of Appeal Civil Division |
| Judge: | Mummery, Tuckey and Wilson LJJ |
| Representation | Stephen Bickford-Smith (instructed by Child & Child) for the claimant. |
| Andrew Francis (instructed by Dawsons) for the defendants. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 26 October 2006 |
Catchwords
Easement - Light - Interference with light - Defendants' development interfering with light to claimant's property - Claimant seeking mandatory injunction - Whether interference complained of amounting to nuisance - Whether interference entitling claimant to injunction.
The Case
A claimant was prima facie entitled to an injunction against a person committing a wrongful act, such as continuing nuisance, which invaded the claimant's legal right.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
